The ontogeny of cooperative cognition and fairness norms in distributive dilemmas
La ontogenia de la cognición cooperativa y las normas de equidad en dilemas distributivos
Barra lateral del artículo
PDF
FLIP
Los autores que publican en la Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- El Autor o los autores, desde que presenta(n) a consideración de esta revista su manuscrito, esta(n) informado(s) acerca de la política de Acceso Abierto, como condición indisociable de publicación, lo que significa que ni él(los), ni la revista han de percibir ingreso alguno por concepto de la lectura de resúmenes o del artículo completo, tampoco por su uso o explotación para generar nuevo conocimiento o para desarrollar aprendizajes alrededor de la obra.
- Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo, al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalque permite que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado, siempre que se haga mención a la autoría del trabajo y la primera publicación en esta revista, no se utilice con fines comerciales y que las obras que se deriven del artículo se compartan en iguales condiciones.
- Los conceptos y opiniones expresados en los artículos son responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores y no comprometen a la Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología ni a la Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana. Los contenidos de esta revista se distribuyen bajo licencia de tipo Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional, la cual exige el debido reconocimiento de las obras y cuyos términos se encuentran en: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es
- La Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología es una revista de acceso abierto, por lo que tanto el proceso editorial como los contenidos publicados están disponibles para todos los usuarios sin cargo alguno: la Revista no realiza cobro alguno por acceso, lectura o descarga de contenidos ni por procesos o actividades de la editorial con fines de publicación.
Contenido principal del artículo
Este artículo explora una perspectiva naturalista y culturalmente situada sobre la ontogénesis de la cognición cooperativa y las normas de justicia en dilemas distributivos que implican la asignación de recursos. Según este enfoque, el proceso de toma de decisiones en los dilemas distributivos se basa en consideraciones generales sobre el bienestar de los demás y el respeto de los intereses y derechos de todos en las interacciones conflictivas. El sentido de la equidad se concibe además como el resultado de interacciones sociales y como modulado por factores contextuales. Sin embargo, sostengo que el sentido humano de la justicia en los dilemas distributivos está ciertamente delimitado por principios muy concretos que rigen su expresión y orientan el establecimiento de soluciones razonables, generalizables y prescriptivas en situaciones de cooperación. Esta lógica se ve ampliamente confirmada por múltiples evidencias procedentes de estudios evolutivos y transculturales dentro de las ciencias del comportamiento. Por último, sugiero que la cognición cooperativa y las normas de justicia en los dilemas distributivos deben explorarse como cuestiones científicamente relevantes que son independientes de los supuestos ideológicos sobre la materia que suelen terminar en interpretaciones problemáticas de los datos empíricos.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Adriaans, J., Eisnecker, P., & Liebig, S. (2019). A comparison of earnings justice throughout Europe: Widespread approval in Germany for income distribution according to need and equity. DIW Weekly Report, 9(44/45), 397-404.
Ahrens, L. (2022). Unfair inequality and the demand for redistribution: Why not all inequality is equal. Socio-Economic Review, 20(2), 463-487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwaa051
Almås, I., Cappelen, A. W., Salvanes, K. G., Sørensen, E. Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2017). Fairness and family background. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 16(2), 117-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X15618966
Almås, I., Cappelen, A. W., Sørensen, E. Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2010). Fairness and the development of inequality acceptance. Science, 328(5982), 1176-1178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187300
Anderson, N. H., & Butzin, C. A. (1978). Integration theory applied to children’s judgments of equity. Developmental Psychology, 14(6), 593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.14.6.593
André, J.-B., Fitouchi, L., Debove, S., & Baumard, N. (2022). An evolutionary contractualist theory of morality. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2hxgu
Angarita, R. G., & Viciana, H. (2022). Merit Is Not Meritorious Everywhere: Fairness in First and Third Party Tasks among Kogi Children. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 22(3-4), 246-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340134
Arsenio, W. F., & Willems, C. (2017). Adolescents’ conceptions of national wealth distribution: Connections with perceived societal fairness and academic plans. Developmental Psychology, 53(3), 463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000263
Barreiro, A., Arsenio, W. F., & Wainryb, C. (2019). Adolescents’ conceptions of wealth and societal fairness amid extreme inequality: An Argentine sample. Developmental psychology, 55(3), 498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000560
Barreiro, A., & Wainryb, C. (2023). Adolescents thinking on economic inequality: Expanding the discussion beyond the Global North. New Ideas in Psychology, 71, 101045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101045
Baumard, N., Mascaro, O., & Chevallier, C. (2012). Preschoolers are able to take merit into account when distributing goods. Developmental psychology, 48(2), 492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026598
Blake, P. R., McAuliffe, K., Corbit, J., Callaghan, T. C., Barry, O., Bowie, A., Kleutsch, L., Kramer, K. L., Ross, E., & Vongsachang, H. (2015). The ontogeny of fairness in seven societies. Nature, 528(7581), 258-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15703
Buyukozer Dawkins, M., Sloane, S., & Baillargeon, R. (2019). Do infants in the first year of life expect equal resource allocations? Frontiers in Psychology, 116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00116
Cappelen, A. W., Falch, R., & Tungodden, B. (2020). Fair and unfair income inequality. Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics, 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_130-1
Cappelen, A. W., Moene, K. O., Sørensen, E. Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2013). Needs versus entitlements—An international fairness experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 574-598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12000
Carpendale, J. I., Hammond, S. I., & Atwood, S. (2013). A relational developmental systems approach to moral development. Advances in child development and behavior, 45, 125-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397946-9.00006-3
Carpendale, J. I., & Wallbridge, B. (2023). From action to ethics: A process-relational approach to prosocial development. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1059646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1059646
Cetre, S., Lobeck, M., Senik, C., & Verdier, T. (2019). Preferences over income distribution: Evidence from a choice experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 74, 102202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.102202
Cheng, J. T. (2020). Dominance, prestige, and the role of leveling in human social hierarchy and equality. Current opinion in psychology, 33, 238-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.10.004
Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of personality and social psychology, 104(1), 103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030398
Damon, W. (s. f.). The social world of the child. (No Title).
Damon, W. (1980). Patterns of change in children’s social reasoning: A two-year longitudinal study. Child development, 1010-1017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1980.tb02647.x
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social issues, 31(3), 137-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x
Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective.
Elenbaas, L. (2019). Interwealth contact and young children’s concern for equity. Child development, 90(1), 108-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13157
Elenbaas, L., Rizzo, M. T., Cooley, S., & Killen, M. (2016). Rectifying social inequalities in a resource allocation task. Cognition, 155, 176-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.002
Engelmann, J. M., & Tomasello, M. (2019). Children’s sense of fairness as equal respect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(6), 454-463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.001
Enright, R. D., Franklin, C. C., & Manheim, L. A. (1980). Children’s distributive justice reasoning: A standardized and objective scale. Developmental Psychology, 16(3), 193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.16.3.193
Enright, R. D., Lapsley, D. K., Franklin, C. C., & Steuck, K. (1984). Longitudinal and cross-cultural validation of the belief-discrepancy reasoning construct. Developmental psychology, 20(1), 143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.20.1.143
Essler, S., Lepach, A. C., Petermann, F., & Paulus, M. (2020). Equality, equity, or inequality duplication? How preschoolers distribute necessary and luxury resources between rich and poor others. Social Development, 29(1), 110-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12390
Evans, M. D. R., & Kelley, J. (2017). Communism, capitalism, and images of class: Effects of reference groups, reality, and regime in 43 nations and 110,000 individuals, 1987-2009. Cross-Cultural Research, 51(4), 315-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397116677963
Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454(7208), 1079-1083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07155
Flanagan, C. A., Kim, T., Pykett, A., Finlay, A., Gallay, E. E., & Pancer, M. (2014). Adolescents’ theories about economic inequality: Why are some people poor while others are rich? Developmental psychology, 50(11), 2512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037934
Freyer, T., & Günther, L. R. (2022). Inherited inequality and the dilemma of meritocracy. ECONtribute Discussion Paper.
García-Sánchez, E., Correia, I., Pereira, C. R., Willis, G. B., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & Vala, J. (2022). How fair is economic inequality? Belief in a just world and the legitimation of economic disparities in 27 European countries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(3), 382-395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211002366
García-Sánchez, E., Willis, G. B., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., García-Castro, J. D., Palacio-Sañudo, J., Polo, J., & Rentería-Pérez, E. (2018). Perceptions of economic inequality in Colombian daily life: More than unequal distribution of economic resources. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01660
Garfield, Z. H., Syme, K. L., & Hagen, E. H. (2020). Universal and variable leadership dimensions across human societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(5), 397-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.07.012
Gatica, L., Martini, J. P., Dreizik, M., & Imhoff, D. (2017). Psychosocial and psycho-political predictors of social inequality justification. Revista de Psicología, 35(1), 279-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201701.010
Geraci, A., & Nuovo, S. D. (2018). Toddlers’ Spontaneous Reactions to Inequality in Distributive Actions. J Child Adolesc Behav, 6(379), 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4494.1000379
Geraci, A., & Surian, L. (2011). The developmental roots of fairness: Infants’ reactions to equal and unequal distributions of resources. Developmental science, 14(5), 1012-1020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01048.x
Goudarzi, S., Badaan, V., & Knowles, E. D. (2021). Neoliberalism and the ideological construction of equity beliefs. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17456916211053312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/pc8zy
Goudarzi, S., Pliskin, R., Jost, J. T., & Knowles, E. D. (2020). Economic system justification predicts muted emotional responses to inequality. Nature communications, 11(1), 383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14193-z
Greenberg, J., & Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Equity and the use of overreward to motivate performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(2), 179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.34.2.179
Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage.
Hamann, K., Bender, J., & Tomasello, M. (2014). Meritocratic sharing is based on collaboration in 3-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 50(1), 121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032965
Hamlin, J. K., & Wynn, K. (2011). Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others. Cognitive development, 26(1), 30-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.09.001
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450(7169), 557-559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06288
Henrich, J., & Muthukrishna, M. (2021). The origins and psychology of human cooperation. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 207-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-081920-042106
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage publications.
House, B. R., Kanngiesser, P., Barrett, H. C., Broesch, T., Cebioglu, S., Crittenden, A. N., Erut, A., Lew-Levy, S., Sebastian-Enesco, C., &
Smith, A. M. (2020). Universal norm psychology leads to societal diversity in prosocial behaviour and development. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 36-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0734-z
Huppert, E., Cowell, J. M., Cheng, Y., Contreras‐Ibáñez, C., Gomez‐Sicard, N., Gonzalez‐Gadea, M. L., Huepe, D., Ibanez, A., Lee, K., & Mahasneh, R. (2019). The development of children’s preferences for equality and equity across 13 individualistic and collectivist cultures. Developmental science, 22(2), e12729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12729
Iturra, J., Castillo, J. C., Maldonado, L., & Orellana, C. I. R. (2023). La percepción de desigualdad económica y su influencia sobre la justificación de las diferencias de ingreso legítimas. Estudios Sociológicos, 41(122), 309-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/es.2023v41n122.2260
Jost, J. T. (2020). A theory of system justification. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674247192
Kanngiesser, P., & Warneken, F. (2012). Young children consider merit when sharing resources with others. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043979
Karuza, J., & Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Justice Judgements: Role Demands and Perception of Fairness.
Kazemi, A., Eek, D., & Gärling, T. (2017). Equity, equal shares or equal final outcomes? Group goal guides allocations of public goods. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00036
Kenward, B., & Dahl, M. (2011). Preschoolers distribute scarce resources according to the moral valence of recipients’ previous actions. Developmental psychology, 47(4), 1054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023869
Kienbaum, J., & Wilkening, F. (2009). Children’s and adolescents’ intuitive judgements about distributive justice: Integrating need, effort, and luck. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6(4), 481-498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620701497299
Killen, M., Smetana, J. G., & Smetana, J. (2006). Social–cognitive domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. En Handbook of moral development (pp. 137-172). Psychology Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410615336
Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice.
Kohlberg, L., & Gilligan, C. (1971). The adolescent as a philosopher: The discovery of the self in a postconventional world. Daedalus, 1051-1086.
Kornbluh M. E., Pykett A. A., Flanagan C. A. (2019). Exploring the associations between youths’ explanations of poverty at the societal level and judgments of distributive justice. Developmental Psychology, 55, 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000523
Lamm, H., & Schwinger, T. (1980). Norms concerning distributive justice: Are needs taken into consideration in allocation decisions? Social Psychology Quarterly, 425-429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3033962
Lamm, H., & Schwinger, T. (1983). Need consideration in allocation decisions: Is it just? The Journal of Social Psychology, 119(2), 205-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1983.9922822
Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms 1. Journal of personality, 45(1), 1-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00591.x
Leventhal, G. S. (1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. En Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 91-131). Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60059-3
Leventhal, G. S., & Weiss, T. (1975). Perceived need and the response to inequitable distributions of reward. Unpublished manuscript, Wayne State University.
Liaquat, U., Jost, J. T., & Balcetis, E. (2023). System justification motivation as a source of backlash against equality‐promoting policies—And what to do about it. Social Issues and Policy Review, 17(1), 131-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12093
Malti, T., Gummerum, M., Ongley, S., Chaparro, M., Nola, M., & Bae, N. Y. (2016). “Who is worthy of my generosity?” Recipient characteristics and the development of children’s sharing. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(1), 31-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414567007
Meindl, P., Iyer, R., & Graham, J. (2019). Distributive justice beliefs are guided by whether people think the ultimate goal of society is well-being or power. Basic and applied social psychology, 41(6), 359-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2019.1663524
Mikula, G., & Schwinger, T. (1978). Intermember relations and reward allocation: Theoretical considerations of affects. Dynamics of group decisions, 229-250.
Mistry, R. S., Elenbaas, L., Griffin, K. M., Nenadal, L., & Yassine, A. (2021). Advancing developmental intergroup perspectives on social class. Child Development Perspectives, 15(4), 213-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12431
Mitchell, G., Tetlock, P. E., Mellers, B. A., & Ordonez, L. D. (1993). Judgments of social justice: Compromises between equality and efficiency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.65.4.629
Nettle, D., & Saxe, R. (2020). Preferences for redistribution are sensitive to perceived luck, social homogeneity, war and scarcity. Cognition, 198, 104234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104234
Niehues, J. (2014). Subjective perceptions of inequality and redistributive preferences: An international comparison. Cologne Institute for Economic Research. IW-TRENDS Discussion Paper, 2(1), 23.
Noh, J. Y. (2020). Children’s developing understanding of merit in a distributive justice context. Journal of Child and family studies, 29, 1484-1492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01606-2
Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2011). Building a better America—One wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on psychological science, 6(1), 9-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393524
Ozono, H. (2021). Function of hierarchy on Cooperation in large-scale human societies. Japanese Journal of Animal Psychology, 71(1), 63-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2502/janip.71.1.6
Paulus, M. (2014). The early origins of human charity: Developmental changes in preschoolers’ sharing with poor and wealthy individuals. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00344
Paulus, M. (2015). Children’s inequity aversion depends on culture: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of experimental child psychology, 132, 240-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.12.007
Paulus, M., & Essler, S. (2020). Why do preschoolers perpetuate inequalities? Theoretical perspectives on inequity preferences in the face of emerging concerns for equality. Developmental Review, 58, 100933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100933
Paulus, M., & Moore, C. (2017). Preschoolers’ generosity increases with understanding of the affective benefits of sharing. Developmental science, 20(3), e12417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12417
Piaget, J. (2013). The moral judgment of the child. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315009681
Rizzo, M. T., Elenbaas, L., Cooley, S., & Killen, M. (2016). Children’s recognition of fairness and others’ welfare in a resource allocation task: Age related changes. Developmental psychology, 52(8), 1307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000134
Rizzo, M. T., & Killen, M. (2016). Children’s understanding of equity in the context of inequality. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34(4), 569-581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12150
Ronay, R., Maddux, W. W., & Von Hippel, W. (2020). Inequality rules: Resource distribution and the evolution of dominance-and prestige-based leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(2), 101246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.04.004
Sainz, M., García-Castro, J. D., Jiménez-Moya, G., & Lobato, R. M. (2023). How do people understand the causes of poverty and wealth? A revised structural dimensionality of the attributions about poverty and wealth scales. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 31(1), 81-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/175982721X16645485533332
Schäfer, M., Haun, D. B., & Tomasello, M. (2015). Fair is not fair everywhere. Psychological science, 26(8), 1252-1260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615586188
Schmidt, M. F., & Sommerville, J. A. (2011). Fairness expectations and altruistic sharing in 15-month-old human infants. PloS one, 6(10), e23223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023223
Schmidt, M. F., Svetlova, M., Johe, J., & Tomasello, M. (2016). Children’s developing understanding of legitimate reasons for allocating resources unequally. Cognitive Development, 37, 42-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.11.001
Schwinger, T. (1986). The need principle of distributive justice. En Justice in social relations (pp. 211-225). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5059-0_11
Schwinger, T., & Lamm, H. (1981). Justice norms in allocation decisions: need consideration as a function of resource adequacy for complete need satisfaction, recipients’ contributions, and recipients’ interpersonal attraction. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 9(2), 235-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1981.9.2.235
Sequeira, M.-E. (2023). Fairness, partner choice, and punishment: An ethnographic study of cooperative behavior among children in Helsinki, Finland. Ethos. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etho.12385
Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-cultural research, 29(3), 240-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719502900302
Singh, M., & Glowacki, L. (2022). Human social organization during the Late Pleistocene: Beyond the nomadic-egalitarian model. Evolution and Human Behavior. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32942/OSF.IO/VUSYE
Sloane, S., Baillargeon, R., & Premack, D. (2012). Do infants have a sense of fairness? Psychological science, 23(2), 196-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611422072
Smetana, J. G., Jambon, M., & Ball, C. (2013). The social domain approach to children’s moral and social judgments. En Handbook of moral development (pp. 23-45). Psychology Press.
Smetana, J. G., Jambon, M., & Ball, C. L. (2018). Normative changes and individual differences in early moral judgments: A constructivist developmental perspective. Human Development, 61(4-5), 264-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000492803
Starmans, C., Sheskin, M., & Bloom, P. (2017). Why people prefer unequal societies. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(4), 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0082
Surian, L., Ueno, M., Itakura, S., & Meristo, M. (2018). Do infants attribute moral traits? Fourteen-month-olds’ expectations of fairness are affected by agents’ antisocial actions. Frontiers in psychology, 1649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01649
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge University Press.
Ueshima, A., & Kameda, T. (2021). Reducing variance or helping the poorest? A mouse tracking approach to investigate cognitive bases of inequality aversion in resource allocation. Royal Society open science, 8(3), 201159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201159
Ueshima, A., Mercier, H., & Kameda, T. (2021). Social deliberation systematically shifts resource allocation decisions by focusing on the fate of the least well-off. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 92, 104067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104067
Warneken, F., Lohse, K., Melis, A. P., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Young children share the spoils after collaboration. Psychological science, 22(2), 267-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610395392
