Redes sociales, autoeficacia academica y bienestar en adolescentes de la zona Maya de Yucatan

Social networks, academic self-efficacy, and perception of wellbeing in Mayan adolescents in Mexico.

Contenido principal del artículo

Pedro Antonio Sánchez Escobedo
Mariel Alejandra Gómez-Rivero

The relationship between the use of social networks and the students´ academic self-efficacy and perception of wellbeing is explorer in adolescents from the Mayan zone of the Yucatán, Mexico. Three instruments exploring these variables were administered to 1013 students form 7th and 9th grades.   Access to social network in these adolescents seem to be like those in the cities, suggesting some equity in these two contexts. Results evidences no significant relationships between the variables, expect from the logical significant relationship between high self-efficacy and better school grades.  Women scored higher in every dimension of wellbeing and reported higher expectations for college entrance than men. Nine graders scored lower both in self efficacy and perceptions of wellbeing, maybe because to developmental issues associated to adolescence. This higher perception of wellbeing in rural women deserves further considerations in view of commonly held beliefs that women in rural context are in vulnerability and disadvantage in comparison to men.

Palabras clave


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo


Alvídrez, S. & Rojas-Solís, J. L. (2018). Los amantes en la época del smartphone: aspectos comunicativos y psicológicos relativos al inicio y mantenimiento de la relación romántica Global Media Journal, 14 (27), 1-18. Recuperado de: DOI:

Altman, I. & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Recuperado de:

Beam, C., Marcus, K. Turkheimer, E. & Emery, R. (2018). Gender Differences in the Structure of Marital Quality. Behavior Genetics, 48(3), 209-223. doi: 10.1007/s10519-018-9892-4. Recuperado de: DOI:

Blanca, M. J. & Bendayan, R. (2018). Spanish version of the Phubbing Scale: Internet addiction, Facebook intrusion, and fear of missing out as correlates. Psicothema, 30(4), 449-454. Recuperado de:

Burke, M. (2011). Reading, writing, relationships: The impact of social network sites on relations and well-being. Recuperado de:

Campbell, C. & Murray, E. (2015). Measuring the Impact of Technology on Couple Relationships: The Development of the Technology and Intimate Relationship DOI:

Assessment. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 14, 254-256. Recuperado de:

Capilla, E. & Cubo Delgado, S. (2017). Phubbing: conenctados a la red y desconectados de la realidad. Un analisis en relaciona al bienestar psicológico. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 50, 173-185. Recuperado DOI:


Chotpitayasunondh, V. & Douglas, K. (2018a). The effects of "phubbing" on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48 (6), 304-316. Recuperado DOI:


Chotpitayasunondh, V. & Douglas, K. (2018b). Measuring Phone Snubbing Behavior: Development and Validation of the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) and the DOI:

Generic Scale of Being Phubbed (GSBP). Computers in Human Behavior,

, 5-17. Recuperado de:

Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9-18. Recuperado de: DOI:

Cizmeci, E. (2017). Disconnected, though satisfied: Phubbing behavior and relationship satisfaction. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 7, 364-375. Recuperado de: DOI:

Clark, M.S., Aragón, O.R., & Hirsch, J.L. (2015). Social relationships in adulthood. En J. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 563- 569). London: Elsevier Publishers. Recuperado de: DOI:

Coyne, S.M., Stockdale, L., Busby, D., Iverson, B. & Grant, D.M. (2011). "I Luv U :)!": A

Descriptive Study of the Media Use of Individuals in Romantic Relationships. Family Relations, 60(2), 150-162. Recuperado de: DOI:

Cutrona, C., Bodemann, G., Randall, A., Clavel, F. & Johnson, M. (2018). Stress, Dyadic Coping and Social Support. En A. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships. (pp. 341-352). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI:

David, M. E., & Roberts, J. A. (2017). Phubbed and alone: Phone snubbing, social exclusion, and attachment to social media. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 155-163. Recuperado de: DOI:

Duck, S. & McMahan, D. T. (2017). Communication in everyday life: A survey of communication. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks. Recuperado de:

Dwyer, R., Kushlev, K., & Dunn, E. (2018). Smartphone use undermines enjoyment of face-to- face social interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 233–239. DOI:

González-Rivera, J., Segura-Abreu, L., & Urbistondo-Rodríguez, V. (2018). Phubbing en las Relaciones Románticas: Uso del celular, satisfacción en la pareja, Bienestar Psicológico y Salud Mental. Interacciones, 4(2), 81-91. DOI:

Hertlein, K. M., & Blumer, M. L. (2014). The Couple and Family Technology Framework: Intimate relationships in a digital age. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge. 234 pp. Recuperado de:

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. DOI:

Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Şahin, B. M., ... & Babadağ, B. (2015). Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: A structural equation model. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4, 60-74. Recuperado de: DOI:

Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Şahin, B. M., ... & Babadağ, B. (2016). The virtual world’s current addiction: Phubbing. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addiction, 3, 250-269. Recuperado de:'s_Current_Addiction_Phubbing DOI:

Kerlinger, F. & Lee, H. (2002). Investigación del comportamiento. Métodos de investigación en Ciencias Sociales. Ciudad de México: Mc Graw-Hill. Recuperado de:

Krasnova, H., Abramova, O., Notter, I., & Baumann, A. (2016). Why Phubbing is Toxic for your Relationship: Understanding the Role of Smartphone Jealousy among “Generation Y" Users. Research Papers. 109.

Lenhart, A. & Duggan, M. (2014) Couples, the Internet and Social Media. Pew Research Center (Report). Pew Research Center, Washington, D. C. Recuperado de:

McDaniel, B. T. (2015). “Technoference”: Everyday intrusions and interruptions of technology in couple and family relationships. En C. J. Bruess (Ed.), Family communication in the age of digital and social media. (pp. 228-243). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well- being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85-98. DOI:

Morling, B. (2017). Research Methods in Psychology. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. Recuperado de:

Nazir, T. & Pikin, M. (2016). Phubbing: A Technological Invasion Which Connected the World but Disconnected Humans. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(4), 175-182. Recuperado de: DOI:

Nina, R. & Agosto, O. (Julio, 2019). Pphubbing: problemas actuales de la pareja.

Trabajo presentado en el XXXVII Congreso Interamericano de Psicología (SIP). Habana, Cuba.

Nina, R. & Rodríguez, R. (2016). El uso de la tecnología en la comunicación marital: Análisis psicométricos del Comari-T. En Diaz-Loving, R., Reyes Lagunes, I.

Rivera, S., Hernández. J. & García, R. (Editores). Psicología Social en México

(Vol. XVI). México: UNAM/AMEPSO. (pp. 41-46). ISBN:978-607-96539-5-8.

Nina, R., Torres, L. & Vargas, Y. (Julio, 2019). El mundo de la pareja: Análisis psicosocial de la calidad marital. Trabajo presentado en el XXXVII Congreso Interamericano de Psicología (SIP). Habana, Cuba.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1995). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Recuperado de:

Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. New York: Suny Press. Recuperado de:

Przybylski, A. & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237-246. Recuperado de: DOI:

Raykov, T., & Shrout, P. E. (2002). Reliability of scales with general structure: Point and interval estimation using a structural equation modeling approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 195–212. DOI:

Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134-141. Recuperado de: DOI:

Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2017). Put down your phone and listen to me: How boss phubbing undermines the psychological conditions necessary for employee engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 206-217. Recuperado de: DOI:

Sánchez Aragón, R. (2017). Autodivulgación: Medición en la pareja mexicana. Revista DOI:

Iberoamericana de Psicología 10 (2), 113-124. Obtenido de:

Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507-514. DOI:

Sillars, A. & Vangelisti, A. (2018). Communication: basic properties and Their relevance to relationship research. En A. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships. (pp. 243-255). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Recuperado de: DOI:

Spencer, T. A., Lambertsen, A., Hubler, D. S., & Burr, B. K. (2017). Assessing the mediating effect of relationship dynamics between perceptions of problematic media use and relationship satisfaction. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39, 80–86. Recuperado de: DOI:

T’ng, S.T, Ho, K.H., & Low, S.K. (2018). Are you “phubbing” me? The Determinants of Phubbing Behavior and Assessment of Measurement Invariance across Sex Differences. International and Multidisciplinary. Journal of Social Sciences,7(2), 159-190. Recuperado de: DOI:

Turkle, S. (2016). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books. Recuperado de:

Turkle, S. (2017). Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age.

New York: Penguin Press. Recuperado de:

Vanden, M., Antheunis, M.L. & Schouten, A. P. (2016). The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 562-569. DOI:

Vangelisti, A. L., & Perlman, D. (2018). The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships. The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships. DOI:

Vaterlaus, J.M. & Tulane, S. (2019). The Perceived Influence of Interactive Technology on Marital Relationships. Contemporary Family Therapy, 41, 247-257. DOI:

Vitak, J. & Ellison, E. (2018). Personal Relationships and Technology in the Digital Age. En A. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships. (pp. 481-493). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Recuperado de: DOI:

Wang, S., Xie, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P. & Lei, L. (2017). Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length. Personality and Individual Differences, 110,12-17. Recuperado de: DOI:

Wong, Y. (2010). Limitaciones y alcances del enfoque de domesticación de la tecnología en el estudio del teléfono celular. Comunicación y Sociedad, 13, 173-200. Recuperado de: