¿Influye la comunicación sobre asuntos sociales y políticos en la eficacia política interna y en las expectativas de participación sociopolítica de los adolescentes españoles?
Does communication on social and political issues influence the internal political efficacy and the expected sociopolitical participation of Spanish adolescents?
Barra lateral del artículo
PDF
FLIP
Los autores que publican en la Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- El Autor o los autores, desde que presenta(n) a consideración de esta revista su manuscrito, esta(n) informado(s) acerca de la política de Acceso Abierto, como condición indisociable de publicación, lo que significa que ni él(los), ni la revista han de percibir ingreso alguno por concepto de la lectura de resúmenes o del artículo completo, tampoco por su uso o explotación para generar nuevo conocimiento o para desarrollar aprendizajes alrededor de la obra.
- Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo, al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalque permite que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado, siempre que se haga mención a la autoría del trabajo y la primera publicación en esta revista, no se utilice con fines comerciales y que las obras que se deriven del artículo se compartan en iguales condiciones.
- Los conceptos y opiniones expresados en los artículos son responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores y no comprometen a la Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología ni a la Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana. Los contenidos de esta revista se distribuyen bajo licencia de tipo Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional, la cual exige el debido reconocimiento de las obras y cuyos términos se encuentran en: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es
- La Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología es una revista de acceso abierto, por lo que tanto el proceso editorial como los contenidos publicados están disponibles para todos los usuarios sin cargo alguno: la Revista no realiza cobro alguno por acceso, lectura o descarga de contenidos ni por procesos o actividades de la editorial con fines de publicación.
Contenido principal del artículo
La participación de los estudiantes en debates, búsqueda de información, etc., sobre asuntos sociopolíticos, la eficacia política interna y las expectativas sociopolíticas de participación son indicadores de compromiso cívico adolescente. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la influencia de la Participación comunicativa sociopolítica de los adolescentes de España en las Expectativas de participación sociopolítica, de forma directa y a través de la Eficacia política interna según el género. Esta investigación basada en el proyecto “Barómetro OPINA” fué transversal y participaron 4711 adolescentes con edades comprendidas entre los 13 y los 18 años. Los instrumentos utilizados fueron tres escalas que medían los indicadores de compromiso cívico propuestos. Se realizaron comparaciones de media, un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales y un análisis de invarianza según el sexo. Los resultados obtenidos mostraron diferencias significativas en las puntuaciones de Expectativas de participación sociopolítica y Eficacia política interna. El modelo mostró buenos indicadores de ajuste sin efectos de mediación e invarianza según el sexo. Establecer debates sociopolíticos con familiares y amigos o ver noticias explica las creencias que tienen los jóvenes sobre cómo influir en la política y cómo intervenir en un futuro en situaciones que beneficien a su comunidad.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Amadeo, J., Torney-Purta, J. and Barber, C.H. (2004) Attention to Media and Trust in Media Sources: An Analysis of Data from the IEA Civic Education Study, College Park, MD: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement, University of Maryland.
Arens, A. K., & Watermann, R. (2017). Political efficacy in adolescence: Development, gender differences, and outcome relations. Developmental psychology, 53(5), 933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000300
Barrett, M., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2014). Political and civic engagement and participation: Towards an integrative perspective. Journal of Civil Society, 10(1), 5-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2013.871911
Beaumont, E. (2010). Political agency and empowerment: pathways for developing a sense of political efficacy in young adults. In L. Sherrod, J. Torney-Purta, & C. Flanagan (Eds.), Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth (pp. 525–558). Hoboken: Wiley DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470767603.ch20
Beaumont, E. (2011). Promoting political agency, addressing political inequality: A multilevel model of internal political efficacy. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 216-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000976
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 233-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Cicognani, E., Zani, B., Fournier, B., Gavray, C., & Born, M. (2012). Gender differences in youths’ political engagement and participation. The role of parents and of adolescents’ social and civic participation. Journal of adolescence, 35(3), 561-576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.10.002
Claes, E., & Hooghe, M. (2009). Citizenship Education and Political Interest: Is there a Connection? In M. Print & H. Milner (Eds.), Civic Education and Youth Political Participation, (pp. 85–102). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460910258_006
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Delli Carpini,M. X. ( 2000 ). Gen.Com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17, 341 – 349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600050178942
Diemer, M. A., & Li, C.-H. (2011). Critical consciousness development and political participation among marginalized youth. Child Development, 82(6), 1815–1833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01650.x
Dostie-Goulet, E. (2009). Social networks and the development of political interest. Journal of youth studies, 12(4), 405-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260902866512
Eckstein, K., Noack, P., & Gniewosz, B. (2012). Attitudes toward political engagement and willingness to participate in politics: Trajectories throughout adolescence. Journal of adolescence, 35(3), 485-495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.07.002
Flanagan, C. A., Cumsille, P., Gill, S., & Gallay, L. S. (2007). School and community climates and civic commitments: Patterns for ethnic minority and majority students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.421
Fletcher, A. C., Elder, G. H., & Mekos, D. (2000). Parental influences on adolescent involvement in community activities. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 29–48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/SJRA1001_2
Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2004). Entering the arena? Gender and the decision to run for ofce. American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 264–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00069.x
Fridkin, K. L., & Kenney, P. J. (2007). Examining the gender gap in children’s attitudes toward politics. Sex Roles, 56(3), 133-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9156-2
Gaby, S. (2017). The civic engagement gap (s): Youth participation and inequality from 1976 to 2009. Youth & Society, 49(7), 923-946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X16678155
Gordon, H. R. (2008). Gendered paths to teenage political participation: Parental power, civic mobility, and youth activism. Gender & Society, 22(1), 31-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243207311046
Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In Girls at puberty (pp. 201-228). Boston: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0354-9_10
Hooghe, M., & Dejaeghere, Y. (2007). Does the “Monitorial Citizen” Exists? An Empirical Iinvestigation Into the Occurence of Postmodern Forms of Citizenship in the Nordic Countries. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 249–271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00180.x
Hope, E., & Jagers, R. (2014). The role of sociopolitical attitudes and civic education in the civic engagement of black youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(3), 460–470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12117
Jenkins, K. (2005, June). Gender and civic engagement: Secondary analysis of survey data. Circle Working Paper 41. Medford, MA: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. Retrieved from: http://www.civicyouth.org/PopUps/WorkingPapers/WP41Jenkins.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2021
Kirchler, E., Palmonari, A. y Pombeni, M.L. (1993). Developmental tasks and adolescents ́relationships with their peers and their family. En S. Jackson y H. Rodriguez-Tomé (Eds.), Adolescence and its social worlds (pp.145-167). Hove: LEA.
Krampen, G. (2000). Transition of adolescent political action orientations to voting behavior in early adulthood in view of a social‐cognitive action theory model of personality. Political Psychology, 21(2), 277-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00188
Levy, B. L. (2013). An empirical exploration of factors related to adolescents’ political efficacy. Educational Psychology, 33(3), 357-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.772774
Lopez , M. H. , Kirby , E. , & Sagoff , J. ( 2005 ). The youth vote 2004 . College Park , MD : CIRCLE, University of Maryland .
Manganelli, S., Lucidi, F., & Alivernini, F. (2014). Adolescents' expected civic participation: The role of civic knowledge and efficacy beliefs. Journal of adolescence, 37(5), 632-641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.05.001
Manganelli, S., Lucidi, F., & Alivernini, F. (2015). Italian adolescents' civic engagement and open classroom climate: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 41, 8-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2015.07.001
McDevitt, M., Kiousis, S., Wu, X., Losch, M., & Ripley, T. (2003). The civic bonding of school and family: How Kids Voting students enliven the domestic sphere. College Park, MD: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
McLeod, J., Shah, D., Hess, D., & Lee, N. (2010). Communication and education: Creating competence for socialization into public life. In L. R. Sherrod, J.Torney-Purta, & C. A. Flanagan (Eds.),Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth(pp. 363–391. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470767603.ch14
Mitra, D. L., & Serriere, S. C. (2012). Student voice in elementary school reform: examining youth development in fifth graders. American Educational Research Journal, 49(4), 743–774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212443079
Moreno, C., Rivera, F., Ramos, P., Sánchez, I., Jiménez, A., García, I., Moreno-Maldonado, C., Paniagua, C., Villafuerte, A., Ciria, E., Abate, M., Morgan, A. (2017). Barómetro de Opinión de la Infancia: Manual para su uso. Madrid: UNICEF Comité Español. Retrieved from: https://www.unicef.es/ publicacion/barometro-de-opinion-de-la-infancia-manual-para-su-uso. Accessed 11 Dec 2020.
Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communication in postindustrial societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609343
Pasek, J., Kenski, K., Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2006). America's youth and community engagement: How use of mass media is related to civic activity and political awareness in 14-to 22-year-olds. Communication research, 33(3), 115-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206287073
Pasek, J., Feldman, L., Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2008). Schools as incubators of democratic participation: Building long-term political efficacy with civic education. Applied Development Science, 12(1), 26-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888690801910526
Paxton, P., Kunovich, S., & Hughes, M. M. (2007). Gender in politics. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 33, 263-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131651
Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2005). On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.175
Rosenthal, S., Feiring, C., & Lewis, M. (1998). Political volunteering from late adolescence to young adulthood: Patterns and predictors. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 477–493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998.tb01231.x
Salado, V., Moreno-Maldonado, C., Moreno, C., & Rivera, F. (2021). The Influence of Developmental Contexts in Adolescent’s Expected Sociopolitical Participation through the Sense of Unity: An Analysis of the Mediation Model Invariance through Sex, Age, and Socioeconomic Status. Child Indicators Research, 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-021-09853-w
Schulz, W. (2005, September). Political efficacy and expected political participation among lower and upper secondary students. In A Comparative Analysis with Data from the IEA Civic Education Study". ECPR General Conference. Budapest.
Schulz, W., Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Losito, B., & Kerr, D. (2008). International civic and citizenship education study: Assessment framework. Amsterdam: IEA.
Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D., & Losito, B. (2010). ICCS 2009 International Report: Civic knowledge, attitudes, and engagement among lower-Secondary school students in 38 countries. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., & Lee, N. (2009). Communication competence as a foundation for civic competence: processes of socialization into citizenship.Political Communication, 26,102–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802710384
Shani, D. (2009). On the origins of political interest. Princeton: Princeton University.
Solhaug, T. (2006). Knowledge and self-efficacy as predictors of political participation and civic attitudes: with relevance for educational practice. Policy futures in education, 4(3), 265-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2006.4.3.265
Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H., & Schulz, W. (2001). Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen. Amsterdam: IEA.
Vecchione, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2009). Personality determinants of political participation: The contribution of traits and self-efficacy beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4), 487-492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.021
Watts, R., & Guessous, O. (2006). Sociopolitical development: the missing link in research and policy on adolescents. In S. Ginwright, P. Noguera, & J. Cammarota (Eds.), Beyond resistance! youth activism and community change: new democratic possibilities for practice and policy for America’s youth. New York: Routledge.
Wray-Lake, L., & Shubert, J. (2019). Understanding stability and change in civic engagement across adolescence: A typology approach. Developmental psychology, 55(10), 2169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000772
Zaff, J. F., Malanchuk, O., Michelsen, E., & Eccles, J. (2003). Socializing youth for citizenship. Washington, DC: Child Trends.
Zimmerman, M. A. (1989). The relationship between political efficacy and citizen participation: Construct validation studies. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53(3), 554-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5303_12
Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581–599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506983
Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Carpini, M. X. D. (2006). A new engagement?: Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183177.001.0001
