Validation of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) in a Mexican Sample
Validación del Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) en una muestra mexicana
Article Sidebar
PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
Los autores que publican en la Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- El Autor o los autores, desde que presenta(n) a consideración de esta revista su manuscrito, esta(n) informado(s) acerca de la política de Acceso Abierto, como condición indisociable de publicación, lo que significa que ni él(los), ni la revista han de percibir ingreso alguno por concepto de la lectura de resúmenes o del artículo completo, tampoco por su uso o explotación para generar nuevo conocimiento o para desarrollar aprendizajes alrededor de la obra.
- Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo, al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalque permite que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado, siempre que se haga mención a la autoría del trabajo y la primera publicación en esta revista, no se utilice con fines comerciales y que las obras que se deriven del artículo se compartan en iguales condiciones.
- Los conceptos y opiniones expresados en los artículos son responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores y no comprometen a la Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología ni a la Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana. Los contenidos de esta revista se distribuyen bajo licencia de tipo Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional, la cual exige el debido reconocimiento de las obras y cuyos términos se encuentran en: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es
- La Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología es una revista de acceso abierto, por lo que tanto el proceso editorial como los contenidos publicados están disponibles para todos los usuarios sin cargo alguno: la Revista no realiza cobro alguno por acceso, lectura o descarga de contenidos ni por procesos o actividades de la editorial con fines de publicación.
Main Article Content
The present study validated a scale to measure the cognitive emotional regulation in a Mexican sample. The aim was to assess the validity of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ), and to examine its divergent validity, based on instruments previously validated. The sample had 464 Mexican youth (332 women and 132 men); the age ranged between 18 and 33 years. Most of them (98.2%) were single. The design was instrumental, transversal, and non-experimental. Besides the CERQ, other instruments were used to measure anger (ML-STAXI), fear (IESM), depression (BDI), and anxiety (BAI). Responses were collected with the platform SurveyMonkey. As a result, the original CERQ 9-factor model showed poor fit in the confirmatory factor analysis (CFI = .853). The exploratory factor analysis yielded seven valid factors: Refocus positively on the plans (8 items, α = .86), Rumination (5 items, α = .78), Blaming on the others (4 items, α = .77), Self-blame (3 items, α = .76), Catastrophizing (4 items, α = .77), Putting in perspective (4 items, α = .70), and Refocus on the positive (3 items, α = .72). The cognitive nature of the CERQ showed divergence with emotional and behavioral variables of previous instruments. As a conclusion, the factors found with the CERQ represent valid and reliable constructs, with potential for programs that want to attend and strengthen the emotional regulation.
Downloads
Article Details
Abdi, S., Taban, S., & Ghaemian, A. (2012). Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire: validity and reliability of persian translation of CERQ-36 item. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 2–7. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.001
Akyunus, M., Gencöz, T., & Karakose, S. (2020). The mediator role of negative cognitive emotion regulation strategies between interpersonal problems and borderline personality beliefs. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-020-00373-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-020-00373-0
Alcázar, R. J., Deffenbacher, J. L. & Byrne, Z. S. (2011). Assessing the factor structure of the anger expression inventory (ML-STAXI) in a Mexican sample. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11(2), 307-318. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.pbidi.unam.mx:8080/ehost/detail/detail?vid=12&sid=06db9189-63c0-4234-b02b-3a6121f485ac%40sdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=67065657&db=asn
Aldao, A. (2013). The future of emotion regulation research: capturing context. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459518
Aldao, A., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2010). Specificity of cognitive emotion regulation strategies: A transdiagnostic examination. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 974–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2010.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2010.06.002
Aldao, A., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2012). The influence of context on the implementation of adaptive emotion regulation strategies. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50, 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.04.004
Aldao, A., Sheppes, G., & Gross, J.J., (2015). Emotion regulation flexibility. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 39, 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9662-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9662-4
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
Bonanno, G.A., Burton, C.L., (2013). Regulatory flexibility: an individual differences perspective on coping and emotion regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 591–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613504116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613504116
Bridgett, D. J., Burt, N. M., Edwards, E. S., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2015). Intergenerational transmission of self-regulation: A multidisciplinary review and integrative conceptual framework. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 602–654. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038662 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038662
Butler, A. C., Chapman, J. E., Forman, E. M., & Beck, A. T. (2006). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.003
Çakmak, A. F., & Çevik, E. I. (2010). Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire: development of turkish version of 18-item short form. African Journal of Business Management, 4(10), 2097–2102 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228631257_Cognitive_emotion_regulation_questionnaire_Development__Turkish_version_of_18-item_short_form#fullTextFileContent
Compas, B. E., Connor-Smith, J., Saltzman, H., Thomsen, A. H., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 87–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.87
Compas, B. E., Jaser, S. S., Bettis, A. H., Watson, K. H., Gruhn, M. A., Dunbar, J. P., & Thigpen, J. C. (2017). Coping, emotion regulation, and psychopathology in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 939–991. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000110
Dobson, D., & Dobson, K. S. (2017). Evidence-based practice of cognitive-behavioral therapy. New York: The Guilford press.
Domínguez, S., & Medrano, L. (2016). Psychometric properties of the questionnaire of cognitive regulation of emotions (CERQ) in university students in Lima. Psychology, 10, 53–67. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1900-23862016000100006
Domínguez-Lara, S. (2019). Diferencias de sexo en las estrategias cognitivas de regulación emocional: un reporte exploratorio en estudiantes universitarios. Cultura, 33(1), 319-327. http://www.revistacultura.com.pe/revistas/RCU_33_diferencias-de-sexo.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.24265/cultura.2019.v33.17
Fiol-Veny, A., Balle, M., De la Torre-Luque, A., & Bornas, X. (2019). Negative cognitive emotion regulation as a predictor of adolescent heart variability and entropy under social stress. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 32(6) 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2019.1641199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2019.1641199
Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V. (2006). Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire-development of a short 18-item version (CERQ-short). Personality and Individual Differences, 41(1), 1045-1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.010
Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotions regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(1). 1311-1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00113-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00113-6
Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2002). CERQ: manual for the use of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. The Netherlands: Leiderdorp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t03801-000
Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2. 3.271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781
Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Fang, A., & Asnaani, A. (2012). Emotion dysregulation model of mood and anxiety disorders. Depression & Anxiety, 29, 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.21888 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/da.21888
Hu, L. & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Jentsch, V. L., Merz, C. J., & Wolf, O. T. (2019). Restoring emotional stability: Cortisol effects on the neural network of cognitive emotion regulation, Behavioural Brain Research, 374(18), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2019.03.049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2019.03.049
Jermann, F., Van der Linden, M., d’Acremont, M., & Zermatten, A. (2006). Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire (CERQ). confirmatory factor analysis and psychometric properties of the French translation. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.2.126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.2.126
Jurado, S., Villegas, M., Méndez, L., Rodríguez, F., Loperena, V. & Varela, R. (1998). La estandarización del Inventario de Depresión de Beck para los residentes de la Ciudad de México. Salud Mental, 21(3): 26-31. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.pbidi.unam.mx:8080/ehost/detail/detail?vid=38&sid=06db9189-63c0-4234-b02b-3a6121f485ac%40sdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=3748275&db=lth
Kraaij, V., & Garnefski, N. (2019). The behavioural Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: development psychometric properties and relationships with emotional problems and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Difference, 137(15), 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.036
Kurlat, S. G. (2015). Leer la cultura popular: desplazamientos desde los márgenes. Latin American Cultural Studies Journal, 4(1), 1-26. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.pbidi.unam.mx:8080/ehost/detail/detail?vid=6&sid=4e6808c1-31e4-4eab-9cb5-90f7b5e754bf%40sdc-v-sessmgr02&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=103197580&db=asn
Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39(2), 124-129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.124
Li, L., Li, S., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., & Zhu X. (2019). Factor structure and measurement invariance for Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) among women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01132
Martins, D., Darcie, M., Gobbi, M. C. (2019). Día de los muertos no México: uma análise folkcomunicacional. Revista Internacional de Folkcomunicação, 38(17), 200-216. https://doi.org/10.5212/RIF.v.17.i38.0012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5212/RIF.v.17.i38.0012
McKinnon, A., Kuyken, W., Hayes, R., Werner-Seidler, A., Watson, P., Dalgleish, T., & Schweizer, S. (2020). The psychometric properties of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) in a clinical sample of adult’s whit recurrent depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 276(1), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.061
Moscoso, M. S. (2000). Estructura factorial del inventario multicultural latinoamericano de la expresión de la cólera y la hostilidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 32, 321-343. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/805/80532204.pdf
Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2004). Thinking makes it so: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to emotion regulation. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory and Application (pp. 229–255). New York: Guilford Press.
Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2005). The cognitive control of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06751.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010
Pedhazur, E. J., & Pedhazur, L. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: an integrated approach. New York: Taylor & Francis Group
Reyes, V., y Reidl, L. M. (2013). Miedo y Afrontamiento en Adolescentes Mexicanos. Psicogente, 16(30), 280-295. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.pbidi.unam.mx:8080/ehost/detail/detail?vid=56&sid=06db9189-63c0-4234-b02b-3a6121f485ac%40sdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=116363863&db=asn
Robles, R., Varela, R., Jurado, S. & Paez, F. (2001). Versión mexicana del inventario de ansiedad de Beck: propiedades psicométricas. Revista mexicana de psicología, 18(2), 211-218. https://psicologiaysalud.uv.mx/index.php/psicysalud/article/view/2563
Rusu, P. P., Bodenmann, G., & Kayser, K. (2019). Cognitive emotion regulation and positive dyadic outcomes in married couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(1), 359-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517751664 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517751664
Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192
Shaughnessy, J. J., Zechmeister, E. B., & Zechmeister, J. S. (2007). Métodos de investigación en psicología. México: McGrawHill
Thompson, R. A. (1991). Emotional regulation and emotional development. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 269-307. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.pbidi.unam.mx:8080/ehost/detail/detail?vid=50&sid=06db9189-63c0-4234-b02b-3a6121f485ac%40sdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=14792029&db=eoah
Thompson, R. A. (1994). Emotion regulation: a theme in search of definition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2–3), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.1994.tb01276.x
Visted, E., Vollestad, J., Nielsen, M. B., Schanche, E. (2018). Emotion regulation in current and remitted depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psycholology. 9, 756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00756 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00756
