Harassment Among Youth: Who Engages in More Bullying in Secondary Schools, Boys or Girls?

Agravios entre jóvenes. ¿Quién hace más bullying en secundarias, los hombres o las mujeres?

Main Article Content

María Teresa Rivera Morales
José María Guajardo Espinoza
Abstract

This study examines the roles of Victim, Perpetrator, and Bystander in school bullying scenarios using a mixed-methods approach that combines frequentist and Bayesian methods. A probabilistic sample of secondary school students was utilized to identify gender differences in each category. Through parametric and non-parametric techniques, the frequentist analysis revealed significant differences in the Victim and Bystander roles, supported by p-values and modest effect sizes, while no significant differences were found in the Perpetrator role. Levene’s test confirmed heterogeneity in variances for the Victim and Bystander categories. From a Bayesian perspective, the Mann-Whitney U test, combined with the Bayes Factor (BF10), provided a more robust evaluation. Bayesian results evidenced strong significant differences in the Victim and Bystander roles, while confirming the null hypothesis in the Perpetrator role, suggesting homogeneity in direct aggression across genders. This approach proved more effective in handling non-normal data and variability, offering consistent conclusions under heterogeneous conditions. The findings highlight a higher frequency of bullying acts targeting females in the Victim role and a more active Bystander role among males, underlining the impact of gender on school bullying dynamics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
6
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
67%
33%
Days to publication 
509
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Publisher 
Bogotá: Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana

Article Details

References

Ato, M., López, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de

los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3),

–1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511

Barboza, G. E., & Finn, J. D. (2018). Intersections of gender and race in school

bullying: A multilevel perspective. Journal of School Violence, 17(2),

–17.

Beran, T. N., & Rinaldi, C. M. (2020). Cultural differences in bullying

perception and responses. School Psychology International, 41(3),

–241.

Bradshaw, C. P. (2015). Translating research to practice in bullying

prevention. American Psychologist, 70(4), 322–332. https://doi.

org/10.1037/a0039114

Espelage, D. L., & Hong, J. S. (2019). Cyberbullying prevention and

intervention efforts: Current knowledge and future directions.

Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 64(5), 271–278.

Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2021). What works in anti-bullying

programs? Analysis of effective intervention components. Journal of

School Psychology, 85, 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.12.002

García, L. F., & Pérez, E. R. (2020). The role of bystanders in bullying

dynamics: A systematic review. Journal of School Violence, 19(3),

–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2020.1727

Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2019). Association between bullying and

psychosomatic problems: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 123(3), 1059–

Hymel, S., & Swearer, S. M. (2019). Bullying: An age-old problem. Educational

Psychologist, 54(2), 1–10.

JASP Team. (2023). JASP (Version 0.18.3) [Computer software]. https://jaspstats.

org/

Jiménez-Barbero, J. A., Ruiz-Hernández, J. A., Llor-Zaragoza, L., Pérez-García, M., & Llor-Esteban, B. (2016). Effectiveness of anti-bullying school programs: A meta-analysis. Children and Youth Services

Review, 61, 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.12.015

Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2018). Electronic bullying and its influence on

adolescent health. Journal of Adolescence Health, 57(3), 337–345.

Mejoredu. (2024). Resultados de la encuesta nacional sobre acoso escolar

–2024. Comisión Nacional para la Mejora Continua de la

Educación. https://www.mejoredu.gob.mx

Morales, J. L., & López, E. R. (2021). Promoting empathy in school settings.

School Psychology International, 42(2), 138–159.

Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2019). The Olweus bullying prevention program (OBPP): New evaluations and current status. En P. K. Smith (Ed.), Making an impact on school bullying: Interventions and

recommendations (pp. 23–44). Routledge.

Rivera, M. E., & Hernández, P. S. (2022). Sociocultural influences on bullying

in Mexican schools. Mexican Journal of Educational Research, 27(1),

–61.

Rodríguez Montes, R. (2023). Diagnóstico sobre acoso escolar en una

institución pública del nivel superior. Atena Editora. https://

atenaeditora.com.br/catalogo

Smith, P. K., & Berkkun, F. (2021). Cyberbullying and its impact on young

people. Cyberpsychology Journal, 15(2), 55–75.

Ttofi, M. M., Farrington, D. P., & Lösel, F. (2021). Bullying, long-term effects,

and adult outcomes. Journal of Social Issues, 77(2), 1–22.

UNICEF. (2020). Violencia escolar en América Latina y el Caribe: Superficie

y fondo. https://www.unicef.org/costarica/sites/unicef.org.costarica/

files/2020-02/cr_pub_Violencia_escolar_America_Latina_y_Caribe.pdf

Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2021). Social-emotional learning and school

climate change. Prevention Science, 24(1), 45–65.

Zych, I., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Del Rey, R. (2020). Empathy as a core element of

anti-bullying programs. International Journal of Psychology, 55(3),

–17.

Citations

Crossref

Scopus
Europe PMC