Analysis of Gender Stereotypes Through the Gentypa Digital Test: Validation and Findings

Análisis de estereotipos de género a través de la prueba digital Gentypa: validación y hallazgos

Main Article Content

Abstract

The Gender Stereotype Test (Gentypa) was designed to assess the internalization of beliefs and stereotypes related to gender, employing an indirect approach capable of reducing social desirability bias, associated to the use of questionnaires, especially when addressing sensible topics such as gender stereotypes. The test was implemented via web browsers and could be accessed on various appliances, including computers and mobile devices with internet connectivity. Participants were asked to manipulate human figures (android and gynoid) across 47 trials, guided by characteristics traditionally associated with gender roles. This unique design allowed measuring perceptions of gender by providing either a balanced perspective or one biased toward specific roles. A factor analysis conducted on the results led to the identification of three distinct subscales. Data collected from a diverse sample of 596 participants, aged between 15 and 70 years, revealed that, overall, individuals tend to attribute greater value to traditional feminine and neutral characteristics. Nonetheless, gender and age differences emerged: men scored higher in traits linked to traditional masculinity and neutrality, while women displayed a preference for feminine traits. Additionally, generational differences were identified, with participants under 35 years old exhibiting a more inclusive perception of both masculine and feminine roles. These preliminary findings highlight the potential of the Gentypa test as a valuable tool for implementing educational interventions aimed at challenging stereotypes and promoting gender equity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
3
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
67%
33%
Days to publication 
478
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Publisher 
Bogotá: Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana

Article Details

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior

and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.

org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Bem, S. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of

Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155–162.

Brescoll, V. & Uhlmann, E. (2008). Can an angry woman get ahead? Status

conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace.

Psychological Science, 19(3), 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-

2008.02079.x

Connell, R. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). University of California Press.

Diekman, A., & Eagly, A. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women

and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social

Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171–1188.

Eagly, A., & Karau, S. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward

female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.

org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573

Eagly, A., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior:

A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology

Bulletin, 17(3), 306–315.

Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69,

-298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719

Gender Study. (Febrero 10, 2024). Key theories on gender roles & social

schemas. Gender Study. https://gender.study/psychology-of-gender/

key-theories-gender-roles-social-schemas/

González-Gijón, G., Alemany-Arrebola, I., Ruiz-Garzón, F. y Ortiz-Gómez, M.

(2024). Los estereotipos de género en adolescentes: análisis en un

contexto multicultural. Revista Colombiana de Educación, (90), 164-

https://doi.org/10.17227/rce.num90-14644

Greenwald, A., Poehlman, T., Uhlmann, E., & Banaji, M. (2009).

Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Metaanalysis

of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social

Psychology, 97(1), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015575

Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being:

Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3),

–428

Jain, T., Dhar, D., Kapoor, V., Kapur, V., Raj, A. (2022) Measuring gender

attitudes: Developing and testing Implicit Association Tests

for adolescents in India. PLoS ONE 17(6): e0264077. https://doi.

org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264077

Kollmayer, M., Schober, B. & Spiel, C. (2018). Gender Stereotypes in

Education: Development, Consequences, and Interventions.

European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(4), 361-377.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2016.1193483

Project Implicit. (s.f.). Project Implicit: A non-profit organization and

international research collaborative. Project Implicit. https://www.

projectimplicit.net

Ridgeway, C., & Correll, S. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A

theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender

& Society, 18(4), 510–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265269

Rudman, L., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash

toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 743–762.

Salgado, J. (2005). Personalidad y deseabilidad social en contextos

organizacionales: implicaciones para la práctica de la psicología del

trabajo y las organizaciones. Papeles del Psicólogo. 26:115-128

Socio Health. (Junio 19 2024). Theoretical perspectives on gender roles

formation. Socio Health. https://socio.health/gender-and-society/

theoretical-perspectives-gender-roles-formation/

Spence, J., Helmreich, R. & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes

Questionnaire: A measure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinityfemininity.

JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 43.

Unity Technologies. (2022). Unity. consultado el 19 de marzo de 2022 en

https://unity.com/es

Wood, W., & Eagly, A. (2010). Gender. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey

(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 629–667).

Wiley.

Citations

Crossref

Scopus
Europe PMC