Cuestionario de Regulación Conductual en el Ejercicio Físico: una revisión sistemática
Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire: a systematic review
Barra lateral del artículo
PDF
FLIP
XML
Los autores que publican en la Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- El Autor o los autores, desde que presenta(n) a consideración de esta revista su manuscrito, esta(n) informado(s) acerca de la política de Acceso Abierto, como condición indisociable de publicación, lo que significa que ni él(los), ni la revista han de percibir ingreso alguno por concepto de la lectura de resúmenes o del artículo completo, tampoco por su uso o explotación para generar nuevo conocimiento o para desarrollar aprendizajes alrededor de la obra.
- Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo, al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalque permite que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado, siempre que se haga mención a la autoría del trabajo y la primera publicación en esta revista, no se utilice con fines comerciales y que las obras que se deriven del artículo se compartan en iguales condiciones.
- Los conceptos y opiniones expresados en los artículos son responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores y no comprometen a la Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología ni a la Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana. Los contenidos de esta revista se distribuyen bajo licencia de tipo Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional, la cual exige el debido reconocimiento de las obras y cuyos términos se encuentran en: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es
- La Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología es una revista de acceso abierto, por lo que tanto el proceso editorial como los contenidos publicados están disponibles para todos los usuarios sin cargo alguno: la Revista no realiza cobro alguno por acceso, lectura o descarga de contenidos ni por procesos o actividades de la editorial con fines de publicación.
Contenido principal del artículo
En el marco de la teoría de la autodeterminación, el Cuestionario de la Regulación Conductual en el Ejercicio fue ampliamente utilizado en múltiples contextos culturales. El mismo permite comprender las regulaciones comportamentales hacia el ejercicio físico y sus consecuencias asociadas. La siguiente revisión sistemática presenta como objetivo analizar sus características y propiedades psicométricas en las diferentes presentaciones lingüísticas. Se analizaron 23 artículos instrumentales con objetivos de desarrollo, adaptación o validación publicados en revistas con revisión por pares en inglés y español identificadas en las bases de datos Dialnet y Scopus. En general, se presentan aceptables indicadores de validez y confiabilidad con ajustes satisfactorios para diferentes estructuras dimensionales, así como, diferencias respecto a la cantidad y redacción de los ítems. No se observó el predominio de un modelo de medición, aunque sí mayor conformidad para la organización de las regulaciones dentro de un patrón ordenado. Las asociaciones entre las subescalas indican constructos relacionados, pero mayormente distintos, requiriendo interpretar con cuidado las distinciones entre la regulación intrínseca e identificada. A su vez, se encontraron relaciones teóricamente esperables con los antecedentes y consecuentes estudiados. A pesar de las diferentes estructuras latentes, la evidencia disponible apoya la multidimensionalidad de la motivación conformando un continuo de autodeterminación.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
American Educational Research Association [AERA], American Psychological Association [APA] y National Council on Measurement in Education [NCME]. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA Publications.
Ato, M., López, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038–1059. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
Bhavsar, N., Ntoumanis, N., Quested, E., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. (2020). Self-determination theory. In The Routledge international encyclopedia of sport and exercise psychology (pp. 565–583). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315187259-41
Brooks, J. M., Kaya, C., Chan, F., Thompson, K., Cotton, B. P., Sánchez, J., Fortuna, K., Cotton, B. P., & Fortuna, K. (2018). Validation of the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 for adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 25(8), 395–404. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2018.25.8.395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2018.25.8.395
Brunet, J., Gunnell, K. E., Gaudreau, P., & Sabiston, C. M. (2015). An integrative analytical framework for understanding the effects of autonomous and controlled motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 84, 2–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.034
Carvas Junior, N., Gomes, I. C., Valassi, J. M. R., Anunciação, L., Freitas-Dias, R. de, & Koike, M. K. (2021). Comparison of the printed and online administration of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2). Einstein (Sao Paulo), 19, eAO6088. https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO6088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO6088
Cavicchiolo, E., Sibilio, M., Lucidi, F., Cozzolino, M., Chirico, A., Girelli, L., Manganelli, S., Giancamilli, F., Galli, F., Diotaiuti, P., Zelli, A.,
Mallia, L., Palombi, T., Fegatelli, D., Albarello, F., & Alivernini, F. (2022). The Psychometric Properties of the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-3): Factorial Structure, Invariance and Validity in the Italian Context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 1937. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19041937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19041937
Chung, P. K., & Dong Liu, J. (2012). Examination of the psychometric properties of the Chinese translated Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 16(4), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2012.693364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2012.693364
Cid, L., Monteiro, D., Teixeira, D., Teques, P., Alves, S., Moutão, J., Silva, M., & Palmeira, A. (2018). The Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-3) Portuguese-version: Evidence of reliability, validity and invariance across gender. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1940. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01940 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01940
Cid, L., Moutão, J., Leitão, J., & Alves, J. (2012). Behavioral Regulation Assessment in Exercise: Exploring an Autonomous and Controlled Motivation Index. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 1520–1528. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n3.39436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n3.39436
Costa, R., Probst, M., Bastos, T., Vilhena, E., Seabra, A., & Corredeira, R. (2018). Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire in people with schizophrenia: construct validity of the Portuguese versions. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40(21), 2577–2584. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1342277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1342277
Costa, S., Oliva, P., Cuzzocrea, F., & Larcan, R. (2013). Assessing sport motivation in non-English speaking exercisers: validation of an Italian version of the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 (BREQ-2). Gazz. Med. Ital. Arch. Sci. Med, 172, 869–876.
D’Abundo, M. L., Sidman, C. L., Milroy, J., Orsini, M., & Fiala, K. (2014). Construct Validity of College Students’ Responses to the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2). Recreational Sports Journal, 38(1), 40–49.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985a). Intrinsic motivation and self determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985b). The general causality orientations scale: Self determination in personality. In Journal of Research in Personality (Vol. 19, pp. 109–134). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. New York: Rochester.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14
Díaz-Leal, A. C., Blanco Ornelas, L. H., Benitez Hernández, Z. P., Aguirre Vásquez, S. I., & Candia-Luján, R. (2018). Propiedades psicométricas del Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 en universitarios mexicanos. Retos, 34, 80–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i34.55794
Edmunds, J., Ntoumanis, N., & Duda, J. L. (2008). Testing a self-determination theory-based teaching style intervention in the exercise domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(2), 375–388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.463 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.463
Farmanbar, R., Niknami, S., Hidarnia, A., & Lubans, D. R. (2011). Psychometric properties of the iranian version of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 (BREQ-2). Health Promotion Perspectives, 1(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.5681/hpp.2011.010
Gillison, F. B., Rouse, P., Standage, M., Sebire, S. J., & Ryan, R. M. (2019). A meta-analysis of techniques to promote motivation for health behaviour change from a self-determination theory perspective. Health Psychology Review, 13(1), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2018.1534071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2018.1534071
González-Cutre, D., Sicilia, Á., & Fernández, A. (2010). Hacia una mayor comprensión de la motivación en el ejercicio físico: medición de la regulación integrada en el contexto español. Psicothema, 22(4), 841–847.
Gunnell, K. E., Crocker, P. R. E., Wilson, P. M., Mack, D. E., & Zumbo, B. D. (2013). Psychological need satisfaction and thwarting: A test of basic psychological needs theory in physical activity contexts. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(5), 599–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.03.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.03.007
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J, Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis, Pearson new international edition. Pearson Education Limited.
Hancox, J. E., Quested, E., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., & Ntoumanis, N. (2015). An intervention to train group exercise class instructors to adopt a motivationally adaptive communication style: a quasi-experimental study protocol. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 3(1), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2015.1074075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2015.1074075
Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., & Bureau, J. S. (2017). Testing a continuum structure of self-determined motivation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 143(12), 1346–1377. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000125
Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., Van den Broeck, A., Guay, F., Chatzisarantis, N., Ntoumanis, N., & Pelletier, L. G. (2020). A review and empirical comparison of motivation scoring methods: An application to self-determination theory. Motivation and Emotion, 44(4), 534–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09831-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09831-9
Li, F. (1999). The exercise motivation scale: Its multifaceted structure and construct validity. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209908402953 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209908402953
Lindahl, J., Stenling, A., Lindwall, M., & Colliandera, C. (2015). Trends and knowledge base in sport and exercise psychology research: A bibliometric review study. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 8(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2015.1019540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2015.1019540
Liu, J. D., Chung, P. K., Zhang, C. Q., & Si, G. (2015). Chinese-translated Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2: Evidence from university students in the Mainland and Hong Kong of China. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4(3), 228–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2014.03.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2014.03.017
Liu, L., Xiang, M., Guo, H., Sun, Z., Wu, T., & Liu, H. (2020). Reliability and Validity of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 for Nursing Home Residents in China. Asian Nursing Research, 14(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2019.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2019.12.002
Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K., & Rose, E. A. (2008). The Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ): Instrument development and initial validity evidence. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30(3), 323–355. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.3.323 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.3.323
Luo, Y., Mullin, E. M., Mellano, K. T., Sha, Y., & Wang, C. (2022). Examining the psychometric properties of the Chinese Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3: A bi-factor approach. PLoS ONE, 17(3), e0265004. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265004
Markland, D., & Tobin, V. (2004). A modification to the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26(2), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.26.2.191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.26.2.191
Millsap, R. E., & Kwok, O. M. (2004). Evaluating the Impact of Partial Factorial Invariance on Selection in Two Populations. Psychological Methods, 9(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.93 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.93
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), 1006–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
Monteiro, D., Moutão, J., & Cid, L. (2018). Validation of the behavioural regulation in sport questionnaire in Portuguese athletes. J. Sport Psychol., 27(1), 145–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t68847-000
Moreno, J. A., Cervelló, E. M., & Martínez, A. (2007). Measuring self‐determination motivation in a physical fitness setting: validation of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire‐2 (BREQ‐2) in a Spanish sample. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 47(3), 366–378.
Moustaka, F. C., Vlachopoulos, S. P., Vazou, S., Kaperoni, M., & Markland, D. A. (2010). Initial validity evidence for the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 among Greek exercise participants. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26(4), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000036
Mullan, E., & Markland, D. (1997). Variations in self-determination across the stages of change for exercise in adults. Motivation and Emotion, 21(4), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024436423492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024436423492
Mullan, E., Markland, D., & Ingledew, D. K. (1997). A graded conceptualisation of self-determination in the regulation of exercise behaviour: Development of a measure using confirmatory factor analytic procedures. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(5), 745–752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00107-4
Ng, J. Y. Y., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Duda, J. L., & Williams, G. C. (2012). Self-Determination Theory Applied to Health Contexts: A Meta-Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612447309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612447309
Nunnally J. y Bernstein I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York.
Pelletier, L. G., Dion, S. C., Slovinec-D’Angelo, M., & Reid, R. (2004). Why do you regulate what you eat? Relationships between forms of regulation, eating behaviors, sustained dietary behavior change, and psychological adjustment. Motivation and Emotion, 28(3), 245–277. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MOEM.0000040154.40922.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MOEM.0000040154.40922.14
Pelletier, L. G., Tuson, K. M., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Briére, N. M., & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.17.1.35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.17.1.35
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The Content Validity Index: Are You Sure You Know What’s Being Reported? Critique and Recommendations. ResearchinNursing & Health, 29, 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Quested, E., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Hagger, M. S., & Hancox, J. E. (2017). Evaluating quality of implementation in physical activity interventions based on theories of motivation: Current challenges and future directions. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10(1), 252–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2016.1217342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2016.1217342
Rodrigues, F, Macedo, R., Teixeira, D., Cid, L., & Monteiro, D. (2020). Motivation in sport and exercise: a comparison between the BRSQ and BREQ. Quality and Quantity, 54(4), 1335–1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-00988-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-00988-6
Rodrigues, F., Teixeira, D. S., Neiva, H. P., Cid, L., & Monteiro, D. (2020). The bright and dark sides of motivation as predictors of enjoyment, intention, and exercise persistence. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 30(4), 787–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13617 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13617
Rodrigues, Filipe, Bento, T., Cid, L., Neiva, H. P., Teixeira, D., Moutão, J., Marinho, D. A., & Monteiro, D. (2018). Can interpersonal behavior influence the persistence and adherence to physical exercise practice in adults? A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02141
Ryan, R. M. & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalisation: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749-761.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived Locus of Causality and Internalization: Examining Reasons for Acting in Two Domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellnes. In New York: Guildford Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Ryan, R. M., Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2019). Reflections on self-determination theory as an organizing framework for personality psychology: Interfaces, integrations, issues, and unfinished business. Journal of Personality, 87(1), 115–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12440 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12440
Teixeira, P. J., Carraça, E. V., Markland, D., Silva, M. N., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9, 78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-78 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-78
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senécal, C. B., & Vallières, É. F. (1993). Academic motivation scale (AMS-C 28), college (CEGEP) version. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(53), 1992-1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t25718-000
Vlachopoulos, S. P. (2012). Measurement equivalence of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire - 2 across greek men and women exercise participants. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 1–17.
Wilson, P. M., Rodgers, W. M., & Fraser, S. N. (2002). Examining the psychometric properties of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 6(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327841MPEE0601_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327841MPEE0601_1
Wilson, P. M., Rodgers, W. M., Loitz, C. C., & Scime, G. (2006). “It’s Who I Am … Really!’ The Importance of Integrated Regulation in Exercise Contexts. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 11(2), 79–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9861.2006.tb00021.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9861.2006.tb00021.x
